Deposition from United States v. SFWMD, et al.,

Case No. 88-1886-CIV-HOEVELER
 
  STYLE:     US vs. SFWMD
  CASE:      88-1886-CIV-WMH
  JUDGE:   WILLIAM M. HOEVELER
  DATE:      August 28, 1990

  NAVIGATION:
                     Index
                    Appearances
                    Proceeding
                    Page:   10
                    Deponant's Certificate (page 15)
                    Ceritificate of Service (page 16)

 

Return to Top                                                                                                                                     1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
MIAMI DIVISION

 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT; JOHN R. WODRASKA,
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SOUTH FLORIDA
WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT;
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND DALE TWACHTMANN,
SECRETARY,  FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, et. al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________________/

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No
88-1886-CIV-WMH  

 

DEPOSITION OF TOM FONTAINE
TAKEN ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF

* * *

 

DATE:   August 28, 1990

 

PROFESSIONAL REPORTING SERVICE
Commerce Center
324 Datura Street, Suite 303
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 659-4046

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                     2

INDEX

 

August 28, 1990

 

DIRECT

 

CROSS

 

REDIRECT

 

RECROSS

 

TOM FONTAINE
By Ms. Beverly Nash 5
By Mr. Joe Richards 42

Return to Top                                                                                                                                     3

 

 

The deposition of Tom Fontaine, in the

above-entitled and numbered cause, was taken before

me, KAREN BAUER FRY, C.S.R., Court Reporter and

Notary Public for the State of Florida at Large, at

Professional Reporting Service, Commerce Center,

324 Datura Street, in the City of West Palm Beach,

Palm Beach County, in the State of Florida,

beginning at the hour of 1:35 o'clock p.m., on

August 28, 1990, pursuant to the Notice in said

cause for the taking of said deposition, which is

annexed to the Court file herein, on behalf of the

Plaintiff in the above-entitled action pending in

the above-named court.

The appearances at said time and place were

as follows:

Beverly Sherman Nash, Esquire
U.S. Department of Justice
Environmental and Natural
Resources Division
P. O. Box 663
Washington, D.C. 20044-0663
Attorney for Plaintiff

Joseph Richards, Esquire
Peeples, Earl & Blank, P.A.
Two South Biscayne Blvd.
One Biscayne Tower, Suite 3636
Miami, Florida 33131
Attorney for Cities of Belle Glade
and Clewiston

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                     4

Katharine Stollman, Esquire
Allison Burdette
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom
1440 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Attorney for South Florida Water
Management District

Jackie Waters, Esquire
So. Florida Water Management District
Box 24680
3301 Gun Club Road
West Palm Beach, FL 33416

ALSO PRESENT:   Toni Lafuente
                                Mike Rose
                                David Buker
                                Ray Roberts

 

 

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                     5

THEREUPON,

TOM FONTAINE

being by me first duly sworn to tell the whole truth,

as hereinafter certified, testified as follows:

DIRECT EXAMINATION

BY MS. NASH:

Q. Mr. Fontaine, I'm Beverly Nash. I'm

counsel for the United States in this litigation.

We're here to try and find out what

computer systems the Water Management District

has, how they operate, and how they're used, and

the data on it, how that data is formatted.

You're here as a representative of the Water

Management District having knowledge on one or

more of the 9 categories in which we're interested

in getting information.

Have you been shown that list of

categories?

A. Yes, I have.

Q. And to which categories are you

knowledgeable?

A. No. 8, would be my best.

Q. What is your title or position?

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                     6

A. It's director of water quality division,

department of research and evaluation.

Q. And what are your responsibilities as

director of water quality division?

A. I oversee the collection of water quality

data and its analysis.

Q. And how long have you been the director?

A. For approximately six months.

Q. Have you had other positions at the Water

Management District?

A. No.

Q. What is your educational background?

A. Going in reverse: I got a Ph.D. in

environmental engineering sciences, that was in

1978. You can tell me how far you want to go back,

if you can.

Masters of Science, environmental

engineering sciences, 1974. Bachelors in Biology,

1972.

Q. What was your position prior to being

director of the water quality division at the

Water Management District?

A. I was at the Great Lakes Environmental

Research Lab in Ann Arbor, Michigan, that's the

NOAAL, National Oceanic and Atmospheric

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                     7

Administration Laboratory.

Q. To whom do you report in the department of

research and evaluation?

A. To two people. Pete Rose and Leslie

Wedderburn.

Q. And what is Pete Rose's position?

A. He is the director of the department of

research and evaluation.

Q. And Leslie Wedderburn's position as well?

A. She's the deputy director of the same

department.

Q. And how many employees work for you in the

water quality division?

A. Twenty-eight.

Q. Can they be categorized in to types of

positions?

A. Yes.

Q. And what would those types be?

A. They range from technicians to senior

professionals with varying degrees in between.

Q. What computers are utilized by the water

quality division?

A. This is all employees?

Q. Yes.

A. There are a number of IBM PS/2s. There are

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                     8

some SUN work stations. I have a Macintosh.

Q. What work is done on the IBM PS/2?

A. As far as I know, it's mostly word

processing. There is, I'm sure, some statistical

analysis. Without elaborating too much, you know,

I think it's fair to say I don't know all of the

details of all the computer work, having been here

only six months.

Q. I understand that. Do you what software

packages are utilized on the IBM PS/2s?

A. Word Perfect for word processing. For

statistical analysis, I believe SAS is either on

the IBMs or it accesses one of the other computers,

but it may be run from the IBM.

Q. And what is the nature of the work done on

the SUN work stations?

A. I believe it's statistical analysis.

Q. And what is the data base on which the

statistical analysis is done?

A. This would be the water quality data base

that resides on something called, a LIMS, L-I-M-S,

system.

Q. In which computers is the LIMS system?

A. The LIMS system, as I understand it, is

something in the chemistry, water chemistry


Return to Top                                                                                                                                     9

division, and I believe it's on physically a Perkin

Elmer.

Q. Do you yourself do any work on the SUN

work station?

A. No.

Q. Do you do any work with the water quality

data base?

A. Not directly, no.

Q. You indicated that you personally use a

Macintosh?

A. I have a Macintosh, yes.

Q. What work do you do on the Macintosh?

A. Primarily, I have a management information

system for my division which allows me to keep

track of schedules, projects, priorities.

Q. Do you have a list of all the projects

that the water quality division is working on?

A. Do I have a list of them?

Q. Yes.

A. Yes.

MS. STOLLMAN: Are you referring to

projects that are on the computer system?

MS. NASH: Yes.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Where is that list

maintained?


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    10

A. I don't have a physical paper list of

anything on the computer systems. Maybe you can

explain a little more exactly what you're looking

for.

Q. Is there a list on any computer of the

projects that the division is doing?

A. Yes.

Q. Does that list have a name?

A. It has a computer name, so if you will --

Q. What is that name?

A. Well, there is more than one project, so

let me give you an example. It would be something

to the effect of "Project, and then a period, and

then 707."

Q. Is there a description anywhere of what

the various projects that are named that way are,

for example, list of what project 707 is and any

other projects that you similarly have listed?

A. There are documents put out every year by

the department of research and evaluation that

describe what goes on in those projects.

Q. And is that list broken down by projects

that the water quality division are doing?

A. Uh-huh, yes.

Q. You indicated that you oversee the

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    11

collection of water quality data. What is the

source of that data?

A. Can you define what you mean by, "the

source"?

Q. Where does the data come from that's being

collected?

A. Well, it comes from sampling of water.

Q. Where are these water samples taken?

A. At various locations in the district.

Q. Is there a record or list of the water

sampling locations?

MS. STOLLMAN: I don't believe you've

established that the samples are taken using any

sort of a computer system.

Are your questions limited to samples

collected by the computer?

MS. NASH: I'm looking at where the

data is that is put into the computer, and that's

what I'm trying to find out.

MS. STOLLMAN: What is your question?

MS. NASH: Can you read back the

question?

(WHEREUPON, the requested testimony

was read back by the court reporter.)

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    12

MS. STOLLMAN: You may answer it, if

you know.

A. Yes.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Where is that record?

A. In various places.

Q. Does the record have a name?

A. No, not that I know of.

Q. What are the various places where the

record is maintained?

A. Well, they're on, you know, paper, and

they're in files.

Q. If you wanted to know where all the

sampling sites were, where would you go to find

them?

A. You're speaking of a file again, not the

physical location. You could get them from my

file. There is an older publication that's called

something to the effect of, "Water Quality Sampling

Network for the South Florida Water Management

District," which was published approximately a year

ago.

Q. Is the information in that publication

still current?

A. No.

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    13

Q. Is there a record of which sampling sites

have changed?

A. Yes.

Q. Where is that record?

A. I would have that information or it is

accessible at the district -- let's put it that

way.

Q. If someone from outside the Water

Management District asked for that record, who

would they ask?

MS. STOLLMAN: Again, I would object

to these questions. The witness has testified

that he is responsive to Area No. 8, which is: "The

locations (where prepared and where maintained) of

all water budgets and nutrient budgets for the EAA,

Water Conservation Areas, Loxahatchee National

Wildlife Refuge, and Everglades National Park."

To the extent that your questions are

directed at identifying the locations of where

those budgets are prepared and where they are

maintained, I will permit him to answer; but these

detailed questions on to other areas that are

related to the water budgets, but not related to

the locations, are inappropriate at this

deposition, and I would instruct him not to

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    14

answer.

MS. NASH: They are directly related

to the locations. The locations are where the data

is collected, and that's all I'm trying to figure

out is how to find out the list of where the data

is collected.

MS. STOLLMAN: The locations, as I

interpret it in this notice, are the locations on

the computer of where they're prepared and where

they are maintained.

You may ask questions with respect to what

computer systems these water budgets are prepared

on, and which computer systems these water budgets

are maintained on.

We're not here to discuss detailed

information about the water budgets and their

specific content other than to the extent it is

necessary to identify which computer files you are

interested in.

MS. NASH: Well, the only way to find

out which computer files we're interested in is to

find out what the data is that's going into the

computer files, and that's all I'm trying to find

out.

MS. STOLLMAN: I will permit him to


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    15

answer questions directed towards general

information which would be required to identify

what computer files they're interested in.

A. Let me --

MS. STOLLMAN: Is there a question

pending?

MS. NASH: Yes, there is.

THE WITNESS: Can I hear it again?

I'm sorry. We lost track of things.

(WHEREUPON, the requested testimony

was read back by the court reporter.)

MS. STOLLMAN: What record are you

referring to?

MS. NASH: The record of the changes

from the publication on the water quality sampling

network that he mentioned.

MS. STOLLMAN: Again, I don't see

that that's relevant to identify what water budget

you want to request, where it's prepared, where

it's maintained.

MS. NASH: Well, I don't know that

until I know --

MS. STOLLMAN: Well, we are not on a

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    16

fishing expedition here. I have given you some

leeway to ask questions that are leading to: How

would I identify what samples are taken and getting

information that you can -- identifying where you

could find that information, but we are not here to

discuss --

MS. NASH: Well, we're not going to

know whether we're interested in the data until we

know where it comes from, and that's what I'm

trying to find out is, just what the list is of

where the data is collected, so we know whether we

are interested in it or not.

MS. STOLLMAN: Your question is: Where

is the list of what data is collected?

MS. NASH: That's correct, or the

data sites. It's not a difficult question.

MS. STOLLMAN: You may answer.

A. Okay. The information on station

location, as it exists now, I can supply you with.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Are you --

THE WITNESS: Can I point something

out?

MS. STOLLMAN: Did you want to ask me

a question?

THE WITNESS: It's just a point of


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    17

clarification on No. 8.

MS. STOLLMAN: If there is no

question pending, I don't want you to answer a

question.

THE WITNESS: Okay.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Did I just hear you say,

Mr. Fontaine, that you know nothing about water

budgets?

A. It's not my field.

Q. Do you know anything about nutrient

budgets?

A. The nutrient aspect is the part of Item 8

that I'm most familiar with.

Q. Can you describe the nutrient budgets that

have been done on the Everglades Agricultural

Area?

MS. STOLLMAN: Again, I would

instruct you to answer this question to the extent

that it's necessary to identify what the different

nutrient budgets are in the computer system.

A. In the computer system, there is no

nutrient budget, okay?

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Is data obtained from data

bases on computers to do the nutrient budgets?

A. Yes.


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    18

Q. What data is utilized to do -- well, let

me back-up.

Is there a nutrient budget that's been

done -- budget or budgets that's been done on the

EAA?

A. I know of one.

Q. And when was that done?

A. This year. Exact date, I'm not sure.

Q. Who did the nutrient budget on the EAA?

A. My staff in cooperation with other

district staff.

Q. From what other divisions or departments?

A. The same department, research and

evaluation, water resources division.

Q. What were the data files that were

utilized to do the nutrient budget?

A. Specific names of files?

Q. Yes, sir.

A. I have no idea.

Q. Who would know?

A. My staff.

Q. Who on your staff?

A. Dave Soballe.

Q. Anyone else?

A. Possibly Brad Jones.

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    19

Q. Are you aware of any nutrient budgets done

on any of the Water Conservation Areas?

A. No.

Q. Are you aware of any nutrient budgets done

on Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge?

A. No.

Q. Are you aware of any nutrient budgets done

on the Everglades National Park?

A. No.

Q. Where are the results of the nutrient

budget on the EAA?

MS. STOLLMAN: This is, where are

they stored? Are you asking him where are they

stored or on what computer system?

MS. NASH: I am asking him: Where

are the results of the nutrient budget; and that is

my question.

MS. STOLLMAN: You may answer if you

know.

A. They definitely are on hard copy paper.

In terms of computer files, I don't know the name.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Who would know?

A. Excuse me, while I think this one through,

because it's going to be on one computer system.

My best guess is, it should be on my secretary's


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    20

computer.

Q. And what is your secretary's name?

A. Sandy Joseph.

Q. And what computer would she have this on?

A. It's a Xerox number -- I don't know.

Q. Who did the nutrient budget analysis on

the EAA?

A. It was Dave Soballe and Brad Jones.

Q. Are you aware of any water quality

analyses that have been done within the Water

Conservation Areas?

A. Within the actual borders?

Q. Of the Water Conservation Areas, yes.

MS. STOLLMAN: And again, limited to

done on the computer.

A. I don't know.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Are you aware of any water

quality analyses of water going into the Water

Conservation Areas?

A. Yes.

Q. Who has done those analyses?

MS. STOLLMAN: Again, these would be

analyses performed on the computer systems.

A. Analyses is different from inputting to a

data table. I'm trying to get a sense of your --


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    21

what you're looking for.

MS. STOLLMAN: Could you clarify your

question, please?

Q. (By Ms. Nash) I'm looking for whether

there have been analyses of any of the water

quality data --

A. Uh-huh.

Q. -- of water?

MS. STOLLMAN: You can answer if you

understand the term "analyses."

A. Well, yeah, I mean statistical analyses of

data is different from simply collecting data.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) That's correct.

A. So are we talking about amassing data in a

file or are we talking about analyzing the data in

the file?

Q. I am talking about analyzing the data

that's in the file.

MS. STOLLMAN: Could you repeat the

question, please?

(WHEREUPON, the requested testimony

was read back by the court reporter.)

A. I'm not sure I know who's done them.

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    22

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Who would know?

A. Who would know? I think -- I think Pete

Rose or Leslie Wedderburn, W-e-d-d-e-r-b-u-r-n.

Q. Do you know what data bases were utilized

to do the water quality analyses of the water going

into the Water Conservation Areas?

A. That would most certainly be either the

LIMS that I have referred to earlier or something

called the Britton-Lee, B-r-i-t-t-o-n dash L-e-e.

Q. Do you know whether water quality data

exists on any computers other than the LIMS or the

Britton-Lee?

A. Yes.

Q. What are the computers?

A. I believe it's an IBM something or other.

Q. And where is this IBM computer that

contains --

A. It's over in -- you know, the main B50

Building.

Q. Do you know who inputs the other water

quality data that would be on this IBM?

A. It would be Dave Soballe.

Q. Is there a difference between the water

quality data on the IBM and that on the LIMS?

A. When you say "difference," you're assuming

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    23

they're both on the same -- I mean, both data sets

are on the same place, right?

MS. STOLLMAN: You can ask her for

clarification, if you don't understand the

question.

THE WITNESS: That's what I'm trying

to get a feeling for.

A. For there to be a difference, they have to

be on the same disk, that has to be on both

computers so --

Q. (By Ms. Nash) But what I'm trying to find

out is, if the data in the data set that's on the

IBM --

A. Uh-huh.

Q. -- is different than the data that's on

the data set in the LIMS?

A. I would characterize it as in addition to

the data on the IBMs, and it's in addition to

what's on the LIMS.

Q. What is the source of the water quality

data on the IBM?

A. This is data from Lake Okeechobee

sampling.

Q. Do I understand then that the water

quality data on the LIMS does not contain Lake


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    24

Okeechobee samples?

A. It will contain some, but not all.

Q. Are there any other differences in the data

bases?

A. I don't really have the experience with

these data bases yet to answer that question.

Q. Who would know?

A. I'm not sure who to direct you to on that

one.

Q. Are you aware of water quality analyses of

water coming out of the Water Conservation Areas?

A. Yes.

Q. Who has done the water quality analyses of

water coming out of the Water Conservation Areas?

MS. STOLLMAN: Again, this would be

water quality analyses on the computer.

A. Okay. I had trouble with this question

last time. Analyses? Those data are on the LIMS

system --

Q. (By Ms. Nash) And as I understand --

A. -- and can be accessed by people

interested in accessing that data.

Q. Are you aware of people that have analyzed

that data?

A. Again, in my short tenure here, I don't


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    25

have any knowledge of people, during this six

months, that have analyzed that data.

Q. Are you aware of any analyses of the

relationship of nutrients from the agricultural

areas to structure discharges in the Water

Conservation Areas?

A. I'm sorry.

MS. STOLLMAN: Could you repeat that

question?

(WHEREUPON, the requested testimony

was read back by the court reporter.)

MS. STOLLMAN: You can ask for

clarification, if you don't understand the

question.

A. Sure. Why don't you go ahead and clarify

that, if you could, or give me a little more time

to search my memory banks.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Why don't you take your

time to think about it.

A. The relationship between nutrients and

discharge into the Water Conservation Areas?

Q. Yes.

A. From the agricultural areas?

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    26

Q. Yes.

A. There are measurements of water quality

concentrations in those discharges, yes.

Q. Who has done these analyses?

A. Okay. The person -- again, I'm having

trouble with the word, "analyses."

Let me just briefly say that there is a

lot of data collected that has not, in my time,

been analyzed in a way that I would call analyzing

things.

There is a person who collects it, who

supervises the collection of it, Larry Grosser,

that's entered into the data base. In terms of

doing anything with that, analytically speaking,

I'm not aware.

Q. In what division is Mr. Grosser employed?

A. He works for me. He's in the water

quality division. He's a technician supervisor,

and is not, for the record, responsible for

analyses of any data.

Q. Are you aware of any documentation of

water quality standard violations?

MS. STOLLMAN: I would object to that

question and instruct the witness not to answer. I

don't believe that's relevant to the locations

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    27

where prepared and where maintained of all water

budgets and nutrients budgets for the areas listed

here.

MS. NASH: I'm entitled to know what

information the water quality division has on its

computers, and that's what I'm trying to find out.

MS. STOLLMAN: I believe your

question goes well beyond that, and you can repeat

it for me.

(WHEREUPON, the requested testimony

was read back by the court reporter.)

MS. STOLLMAN: I don't understand

your question. Could you clarify that for me,

please?

MS. NASH: Ask the witness if he

understands the question.

A. It's a very general question. Are you

looking at some specific --

MS. STOLLMAN: I would instruct the

witness not to answer unless you can

clarify the question, because it seems to be asking

different things. If you want to know what

policies or guidelines there are with respect to

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    28

water budgets and other work done on those systems,

that is one question. The end of your question

seems to go into another area. If you could break

that down for the witness, I would permit him to

answer.

MS. NASH: He is the director of the

water quality division, and I am entitled to find

out whether the water quality division or anyone

else he's aware of has any documentation on

computer, if it makes you happy, of water quality

standard violations, and that is what I am

inquiring into.

MS. STOLLMAN: Well, I don't believe

that's relevant to this area.

MS. NASH: It is relevant to --

MS. STOLLMAN: You are entitled to

ask about what he has on the computer systems and

--

MS. NASH: That's what I'm trying to

find out.

MS. STOLLMAN: -- what each division

has on the computer systems, and if there are

computer guidelines with respect to the water

budgets and nutrients budgets. With respect to

water quality violations, that may -- I mean, if


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    29

that's something that he has listed on his computer

system --

MS. NASH: And I'm entitled to find

out, and that is what the question is.

MS. STOLLMAN: Okay. If there are

computer files which contain information on water

quality violations, then, you're entitled to ask

him if there are such files and where they are

located. And you can answer the question.

A. That's a good enough question?

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Yes. If you can answer the

question.

A. Fine. As far as I know, there is no data

sets out there that specifically say there are

water quality violations in place A, B, or C.

Q. Are you aware of any Water Management

District guidelines for assessing water quality

violations?

MS. STOLLMAN: Again, I would object

to this. "Assessing water quality violations," are

not the subject of this deposition.

MS. NASH: If the information is on

computer, it most certainly is.

MS. STOLLMAN: You can answer to the

extent there may be guidelines on a computer


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    30

system.

A. The answer is no.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) The guidelines for

utilizing the computer for doing water quality

violation assessments?

MS. STOLLMAN: What is your question.

MS. NASH: That is my question.

A. I kind of lost the sense of the question.

Can we go back and do that one again?

MS. NASH: Read back the question.

(WHEREUPON, the requested testimony

was read back by the court reporter.)

MS. STOLLMAN: Are you asking whether

there are guidelines?

MS. NASH: Yes. For utilizing the

computer to do water quality violation assessments.

MS. STOLLMAN: To the extent they may

exist on the computer, you may answer.

A. If I understood your question correctly,

there are no guidelines on the computer.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) My question was, whether

there are guidelines which require the utilization

of the computer to do water quality violation

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    31

assessments?

A. I don't know.

Q. Who would know?

A. I'm not sure.

Q. Are you aware of any GIS files that show

the distribution of nutrients in the areas covered

by the Water Management District?

A. No.

Q. Are you aware of any CADD files which show

the distribution of nutrients in the areas covered

by the Water Management District?

A. "The distribution of nutrients"? Can you

clarify that one?

Q. The location in water samples of

nutrients.

MS. STOLLMAN: Were you asking for

CADD files?

MS. NASH: Yes.

THE WITNESS: Uh-huh.

A. Yes.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Where are those files

located?

A. I don't know what machine it's located on.

Q. Do you know who has responsibility for

those files?

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    32

A. I think the best way of answering this

question --

MS. STOLLMAN: You can answer the

question if you know. I don't want you to

speculate if you don't know.

THE WITNESS: Oh, okay. Sorry.

A. I believe that Dera Muzyk would have the

CADD files.

Q. Are you aware of any CADD files that show

the water quality in the areas covered by the Water

Management District?

A. I'm sorry. That sounds like the very same

question.

Q. The prior question related to nutrient

conservations. This is asking for water quality in

general?

A. Yes.

Q. And where are those files?

A. Excuse me. Are these CADD files again?

Q. Yes.

A. I would try Dera Muzyk again.

Q. Is she employed in the water quality

division?

A. Uh-huh, yes.

Q. What is her title?

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    33

A. Her title is GIS CADD technician.

I should --

MS. STOLLMAN: If there is no

question pending, I don't want you to testify.

THE WITNESS: Okay. Can I have a

second with you?

MS. STOLLMAN: Do you want to ask me

a question?

THE WITNESS: Sure.

(WHEREUPON, there was a discussion

held off the record.)

MS. STOLLMAN: I think the witness

had something to add to your question about the

location of CADD files.

A. Yeah, right. There is one other location

where there is some CADD files that have nutrient

concentrations.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) And where is that?

A. That is up in our Okeechobee Field Station

Water Quality Office.

Q. On the CADD files that you indicated Dera

Muzyk would be most knowledgeable on, do you know

what locations the water quality data is from?

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    34

A. Lake Okeechobee very definitely, and other

locations I'm not sure.

Q. Do you know whether there is any data in

those CADD files from the Everglades National Park?

A. I don't believe so.

Q. Do you know whether there's any data from

the Water Conservation Areas?

A. I don't believe so.

Q. Do you know whether there's any data from

the Everglades Agricultural Area?

A. Can I seek some clarification?

MS. STOLLMAN: Would you clarify your

question?

MS. NASH: Do you have a -- what's

the problem?

MS. STOLLMAN: Is there a term that

you don't understand?

THE WITNESS Yeah. I'm having

trouble with some of the terminology.

MS. STOLLMAN: What terms don't you

understand. I can ask her to define them.

THE WITNESS: Oh, geez.

MS. STOLLMAN: Could you repeat the

question?

THE WITNESS: I hate to make you

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    35

repeat it, but --

MS. STOLLMAN: Could you read it

back?

(WHEREUPON, the requested testimony

was read back by the court reporter.)

A. In CADD files?

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Yes.

A. I don't know.

Q. Who would know?

A. My best guess is Dera Muzyk.

Q. Do you know whether the water quality

division is doing any data base development with

the water quality data?

MS. STOLLMAN: Could you explain what

you mean by "data base development"?

MS. NASH: If the witness understands

the questions, he can answer it.

MS. STOLLMAN: Do you understand the

question?

THE WITNESS: To the extent that the

whole district is working on development of Oracle,

a new data base, but I know nothing about Oracle

itself.

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    36

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Other than the development

of the Oracle data base, is the water quality

division doing any other data base development

with the water quality data?

A. Nothing outside of the existing LIMS and

Britton-Lee that I know of.

Q. You indicated that there was also CADD

files on water quality in the Okeechobee Field

Station Office?

A. Yes.

Q. Who in that office has those CADD files?

A. My best guess is Elaine Rankin,

R-a-n-k-i-n.

Q. Does the water quality division utilize

any GIS files?

A. I don't know of any that they use.

Q. Does the water quality division utilize

any aerial photographs?

MS. STOLLMAN: Again, this would be

in the computer system with respect to computer

analyses or data?

THE WITNESS: Not that I know of.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Does the water quality

division utilize any satellite photography or

imagery?

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    37

A. Not that I know of.

Q. Does the water quality division utilize

any vegetation mapping?

A. Not that I know of.

Q. Does the water quality division do any

trend analysis?

A. Trend analysis?

MS. STOLLMAN: Again, this would be

on the computer.

A. Yes.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Can you describe the trend

analyses that are being done?

A. Yes.

MS. STOLLMAN: You may describe them

to the extent that it's necessary to identify the

files contained in the computer.

THE WITNESS: Sure.

A. The trend analysis is on phosphorus volume

weighted, annual average phosphorus concentrations

entering Lake Okeechobee.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Is the water quality

division doing any trend analysis on phosphors for

other locations, such as, the Water Conservation

Areas?

A. I don't know.

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    38

Q. Who would know?

A. I think the best person to ask would be my

predecessor.

Q. And who was that?

A. That's Tony Federico.

Q. Is the water quality division doing any

trend analyses on water going into the Everglades

National Park?

A. Again, I don't know.

Q. And who would know?

A. I would, again, refer you to Tony

Federico. I'm sorry. Yes, the water quality

division is doing some trend analyses on stuff --

on nutrients entering Everglades National Park.

Q. And who is doing that trend analysis?

A. George Shih.

Q. Do you know the source of the data Mr.

Shih is utilizing to do the trend analysis?

A. I believe he is using data that we collect

and other data from perhaps Everglades National

Park and perhaps the Corps of Engineers.

Q. Is Mr. Shih an employee of the water

quality division?

A. He is on loan to environmental planning

from the water quality division.

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    39

Q. What is his title?

A. Senior professional.

Q. Are there any reports of the trend

analyses Mr. Shih has been doing on the Everglades

National Park?

MS. STOLLMAN: Are you talking about

reports that are on the computer system?

MS. NASH: Or generated by the

computer system.

MS. STOLLMAN: To the extent that you

know, you may answer. I don't want you to

speculate about Mr. Shih work.

A. I have seen no reports.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Do you know which computer

Mr. Shih utilizes to do those trend analyses?

A. No.

Q. Do you know whether Mr. Shih has reached

any interim or preliminary results on trend

analyses in Everglades National Park?

MS. STOLLMAN: I would object to

asking in-depth questions about Mr. Shih's reports.

MS. NASH: If he knows.

MS. STOLLMAN: What is your

question? Could you read it back for me, please?

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    40

(WHEREUPON, the requested testimony

was read back by the court reporter.)

MS. STOLLMAN: I would object to that

question and instruct the witness not to answer.

We are not here to discuss results of analyses.

MS. NASH: We are entitled to know

where the data is, what data exists, how we can

access that data, and if there are preliminary or

interim conclusions that have been reached using

the computer data, we are entitled to know that

they exist and how we can access them.

MS. STOLLMAN: You are not entitled

to know whether or not preliminary conclusions or

results have been reached with respect to analyses

done. We're here to discuss what information

exists and where it is located --

MS. NASH: And that's what I'm trying

to find out.

MS. STOLLMAN: -- not what sort of --

MS. NASH: If these are in data

files, we're entitled to know what files they're

in, what analyses exist in those files, so we can

access that information. That is the whole purpose

of these depositions. That is the very core of

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    41

these depositions.

This is the first substantive information

that we might actually obtain from these

depositions.

MS. STOLLMAN: Well, it's my

interpretation that we --

MS. NASH: Well, fine. He can answer

the question if he knows the answer. If he doesn't,

that's fine.

MS. STOLLMAN: I have instructed him

not to answer the question.

MS. NASH: Well, we'll take that up

with the Court, too.

Q. (By Ms. Nash) Is anyone in the water

quality division doing any work on the Everglades

SWIM Plan?

A. It is not our responsibility to do any of

that work, although, we may be consulted.

Q. Is anyone in the water quality division

doing any work on the potential ONRW designation

for Everglades National Park?

MS. STOLLMAN: We haven't established

whether or not the witness is familiar with that

designation.

MS. NASH: If he doesn't understand

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    42

the question, he can say-so.

A. For my own edification, tell me what the

ONRW stands for.

Q. Outstanding -- I can't remember if it's

national or natural resource water.

MS. STOLLMAN: You can answer to the

extent you know whether someone is still working on

it on the computer system. I don't want you to

speculate if you don't know.

A. Well, I won't speculate then, I will just

say no, or I don't know.

MS. NASH: I have no further

questions

MS. STOLLMAN: Would you like to take

a break before we continue?

THE WITNESS: Sure.

(Short break.)

CROSS-EXAMINATION

QUESTION BY MR. RICHARDS:

Q. Mr. Fontaine, my name is Joe Richards. I

represent the cities of Belle Glade and Clewiston.

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    43

In reference to the nutrient budget on the

EAA, you mentioned there is a hard copy of this

budget. Has this been published by the district?

A. No.

Q. Will it be published?

A. Can you tell me what you mean by

publication?

Q. The district distributes technical

publications, technical memoranda, official

documents.

A. I know of no plans to put out a technical

publication at this time.

Q. Do you know whether this nutrient budget

is available to the public?

A. I don't think that's for me to say,

frankly.

Q. Do you know the time frame covered by this

budget?

MS. STOLLMAN: Which budget are you

referring to?

MR. RICHARDS: The same budget we

have been discussing.

A. Let me think about that for a second.

I believe that it covers approximately

eight years.

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    44

Q. (By Mr. Richards) And the last year would

be? Do you know?

A. That's what I'm having trouble

remembering. I guess I will just have to say I

can't remember.

Q. Okay. You mentioned that you were aware

of water quality analysis of the water discharged

to the Water Conservation Areas. Do you know the

time frame for this thing?

A. This is an ongoing sampling study that has

-- you know, it was there when I got there. I'm

not sure how many years back it goes.

Q. You also mentioned the input of water

quality data on an IBM computer. Do you know the

ultimate destination of that data?

MS. STOLLMAN: Could you clarify what

you mean by "ultimate destination"?

MR. RICHARDS: Do you understand the

question?

A. I'm a little confused myself.

Q. (By Mr. Richards) Is it retained on this

IBM computer or does it end up in another data base

somewhere?

A. My intent is that all water quality data

will go on to the Oracle data base that the

 


Return to Top                                                                                                                                    45

district has or is working on.

Q. Would that be the chemical analysis

archive system?

A. I'm not sure of chemical analysis

system. I don't know that name.

Q. Would it be on the Britton-Lee computer?

A. Okay. Geez, I'm a little confused. Can

we back-up an get that question again?

(WHEREUPON, the requested testimony

was read back by the court reporter.)

A. If I understand your question correctly,

the chemical analysis system that you were