Recent Developments

News         
Press Releases
Litigation
Legislation
Regulations
Law Review Articles
Reports
Research
Conferences

Case Law, Decisions

4-September-2002

MICCOSUKEE TRIBE WINS 11TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS' DECISION AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Today the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, who live in the Florida Everglades, announced that they have won an important victory for both the Everglades and open government.  The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of the Tribe in a case concerning the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). In a September 4, 2002, opinion in case No. 01-16626, the Court reversed and remanded a federal district court decision that dismissed the Tribe's lawsuit concerning the federal government's establishment of the Southern Everglades Restoration Alliance (SERA) as an advisory committee on important Everglades restoration issues.  The Tribe alleged in its lawsuit that the federal government used SERA as an advisory committee without complying with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), such as holding publicly notice meetings.  The Tribe claims the government's use of this committee without complying with FACA resulted in closed door changes to Congressionally authorized Everglades restoration projects that delayed their implementation and continue to cause harm to vast areas of Tribal Everglades.   
Read more....

Read decision
Press/ For Immediate Release        Dexter Lehtinen (305) 279-1166
Miami/September 5, 2002                Joette Lorion

01-Feb-02    

new.gif (1016 bytes)  Miccosukee v. SFWMD, U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 11th Circuit,  case no.  00-15703   
11th circuit decision 

The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians ("the Tribe") and the Friends of the Everglades ("the Friends") (together "Plaintiffs") brought a citizen suit under the Clean Water Act ("CWA") against the South Florida Water Management District ("the Water District"). The suit alleges that the Water District was violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants from the S-9 pump station into Water Management District 3A without a national pollution discharge elimination system ("NPDES") permit.

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The district court denied the Water District's motion, granted Plaintiffs', and enjoined the Water District from operating the S-9 pump station without an NPDES permit. The Water District appeals from the district court's order declaring unlawful the Water District's operation of the S-9 pump station without an NPDES permit and from the injunction prohibiting the same.  

Instead of issuing an injunction which cannot be rightly enforced, the district court should order the Water District to obtain an NPDES permit within some reasonable period. And, if the Water District fails to comply with this order, Plaintiffs may then seek to enforce the order through the various enforcement mechanisms available under the CWA, such as fines and criminal penalties. See 33 U.S.C. § 1319.

For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment that the Water District violated the Clean Water Act, VACATE the judgment awarding the injunction, and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.


May-01   

U.S. v. SFWMD
U.S. Dist. Ct., S.D. of Florida, case no.  88-1886-CIV-Hoeveler
U.S. District Court judge Hoeveler gives the state an extended deadline until the last day of 2006 to complete the cleanup.  

11-Oct-99

U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES SFWMD DID NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST MICCOSUKEE TRIBE IN 1995 FLOODING SUIT
Go to SFWMD press release
By refusing to hear an appeal in a 1995 suit by the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida alleging intentional flooding of tribal lands following Tropical Storm Gordon in 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court last week upheld two earlier court rulings in favor of the South Florida Water Management District and the federal government.  The Miccosukee suit claimed the District and federal government discriminated against the tribe by failing to provide adequate flood control, thus violating the tribe members' rights to enjoy their tribal lands and freely practice their religion. During the fall of 1994, Water Conservation Area 3A in Broward and Miami-Dade counties, where the tribe lives in three different areas, experienced its highest water levels since 1947.


06-Oct-99

Summary Judgment excerpts
Miccosukee v. SFWMD,  U.S. Dist. Ct., S.D. of Florida, case no.  98-6056
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE WINS CLEAN WATER ACT RULING IN FEDERAL COURT
Judge Says SFWMD Needs Permit for Polluted Water Entering Everglades from S-9 Pump
Today, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians announced that Federal District Court Judge Wilkie D. Ferguson ruled in their favor when he granted the Tribe's Motion for Summary Judgment in Case No. 98-6056-CIV-FERGUSON. The Order supports the claim the Tribe made in the 1997 lawsuit filed against the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and its Executive Director that polluted water from urban Broward County is being backpumped into the
Everglades through the S-9 pump.


17-Sep-99
 

Citation
Miccosukee v. U.S., EPA, 
U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 11th Circuit,  case no. 95-5080
EPA year long review determines Florida's 1994 Everglades Forever Act is in compliance with federal water pollution law.   © 1999   Miami Herald.   Go to article.


12-Nov-98

721 So.2d 389
Miccosukee v. SFWMD
, Fl. 3rd DCA case no. 98-1254
Court affirms DEP's order granting permit


11-Sep-98

1998 U.S. Dist 15838
Miccosukee v. United States, USDC case no. 95-0533-CIV-DAVIS
Court finds Everglades Forever Act constitutes change in state water quality standards; remands to EPA


11-Mar-98

6 F. Supp. 2d 1346
Miccosukee v. United States
, USDC case no. 94-0662-CIV-HOEVELER
Court grants defendants' motion to dismiss


10-Feb-97

new.gif (1016 bytes)   105 F.3d 599 (11th Cir. 1997)
Miccosukee v. US, U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 11th Circuit,  case no. 95-5080           

Appellant, Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida (the Tribe), filed a complaint under the citizen suit provision of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. § 1365(a), against the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Administrator of the EPA (the Administrator), and other agency officials. The Tribe alleged that the Administrator failed to comply with its duties under the CWA and to find Florida's water quality standards violated the antidegradation requirements of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1313(d)(4)(B). The district court, finding the Administrator had no mandatory duty to act, dismissed the Tribe's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse.    

 

Revised:  09/22/03

University of Miami School of Law Library
Alberto F. Montero Valdes, Everglades Litigation Curator
1311 Miller Drive
Coral Gables, Florida 33146
Telephone: (305) 284-4093
Copyright, 1999 University of Miami School of Law.
All Rights Reserved.
Requests for information Luis F. Hernandez
Send comments / technical feedback.